Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Controversial Conundrum

I don't usually use big words like "conundrum" but I thought it was appropriate for this post dealing with the situation where people find themselves with "an intricate and difficult problem."

The difficult and intricate problem I am speaking of is encountered when people who are Christians state that they believe in the general theory of evolution as the basis for the origin and development of life. The reason often stated for this belief is “because it is based on valid science.” Before going further, I must admit that I did not see a problem with God using evolution to create life, until I gave it some critical thought.

Before explaining why I believe this is a conundrum, I should explain what is meant by the phrase “general theory of evolution.”

The general theory of evolution holds that our earth and all life on it was created by gradual changes, beginning with non-living matter and leading to the diverse system of life that we see on earth today. The transformation of non-living matter to living organisms and the subsequent gradual changes were driven by a combination of random, undirected activity, mutations and natural selection. This theory holds that there is no evidence that a creator (intelligent life form) directed the origin and development of life on earth.

Why do I believe this is a conundrum? There are two primary reasons.

First, if one is a Christian, then they believe in the God described in the Holy Bible, and that the Holy Bible is divinely inspired-that everything in the Holy Bible is true. Christians must believe that God created earth, plants, animals, and people because it is clearly stated in the Holy Bible.

Valid science involves using the scientific process. The scientific process in its purest form eliminates subjectivity. It uses objective data to prove or disprove the validity of a concept (hypothesis). Valid science reveals truth. Any scientific theory that does not reveal truth is flawed, it is not valid science.

So, if one believes that God (a creator, an intelligent life form) created the earth and all living things, that means they consider it to be a truth. The general theory of evolution does not indicate creation of life by a creator. Since this theory clearly does not indicate what Christians hold to be true, can a Christian consider the general theory of evolution to be true, or consider it to be based on valid science?

Second, according to the Holy Bible, death was introduced by sin. Therefore before sin was committed on earth, there was no death on earth. Adam and Eve committed the first sin at some point after their creation, and therefore after the creation of all living things on earth. The general theory of evolution depends on natural selection. Natural selection is the survival of the fittest, and the death of the least fit. Death had to occur for many years prior to the first sin being committed on earth for the general theory of evolution to be true. Can a Christian believe that the general theory of evolution is true when it contradicts what the Holy Bible states concerning the original sin, and the relationship between sin and death?

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Maybe, just maybe, the Bible was not meant to be read and interpreted so literally. Maybe it is full of metaphors that are meant to make people actually THINK and use their brains (that God gave them) to live a life full of compassion and sensitivity for other living things. Maybe God would appreciate that we look around in wonder and amazement at this beautiful world of his and continue to ask questions, seeking and learning all we can so we can take better care of it. And maybe God would not appreciate us focusing in on the Bible so exclusively that we discount logical conclusions about the world around us.

Anonymous said...

You are on the right track here, Ray. Evolution counts on a lot of events "just happening". The Universe is way to ordered to be have appeared by hapinstance. What "random happening" programmed a fingernail to know it was supposed to be a fingernail and not a finger, and vice versa. To explain that by saying it is by random transformation would be ludicrous. How does evolution explain the computer-like code of DNA? Evolution theroies are like listening to Art Linkletter's kindergarten interviewee's explain the origins of life.